FEATURE REQUEST - adding smaller than 2-column graphical fields
AnsweredHello.
I like to have a graphical indication of my DI2 (before) and now my eTap/AXS gears. Could I ask for possibility to have smaller graphical fields on a profile? Of course some data need to have larger graphical field (map, elevation) but I think for displaying gears it would be nice to have smaller field like it used to be on Garmin/Wahoo. I think it would still be useful and visible and would not waste a surface of 2 columns for such a basic field like gear display. Some people would still need a 2-column display - some like me would opt for smaller one. Please make it choosable. Now a minimal width for graphical field is 2-column.
-
Hi Maciej, thank you for sharing your view on the Graphical fields column and displaying gears.
I can imagine your situation and understand your request. However, to pull this off, it will require some serious work from the Software team and I would like you to know that your feature request will be shared with the proper team.
-
Hello Bijit... Thank you. I will patiently wait. I would like to address that 1-column wide graphical field could be made available only for some data types - such as displaying gears for example - of course excluding such data like map. Now it is a waste of space - when it could just display 2 useful fields near each other.
-
I would like to see something similar except the option to have the graphical field at a smaller height. eg display the gears at the height of the 10 data field cells rather than the current smallest 8 cell height.
Ideally all data fields would be modular and you could place them wherever and however you like within certain limits, but that would be a lot of work.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
5 comments